At Night When Death Whispers
You're Supposed to be Afraid of Death, Dumbass
Monday, February 1, 2010
If you peak behind the big curtain, you might catch a glimpse of God.
When I was at my grandmother's funeral, a rather lavish affair at the St James church in Vancouver, I remember realizing clearly that I was sure there was no Christian god.
Intellectually, I was already fairly convinced. But here I felt it. Or, to be more accurate, I didn't feel anything.
They have this huge purple curtain in at the back, behind the pulpit. While I'm not expert on the symbology used by the Anglican church, from the way the ceremony went, the way they would turn toward the curtain sometimes, it seemed as though the idea was that their god - that's right, I said their god - was behind that curtain. Symbolically, of course, since their god is technically everywhere.
I looked at that purple curtain and felt that we were all in this room with men wearing silly robes of arbitrary purpose, all staring at a big curtain behind which there was nothing but a stone wall. And nothing behind the wall either. Without even the slightest sensation of any kind of higher power in me, it just seemed kind of silly when they rang their bells, sang their hymns, and carried out all their little rituals.
Especially since my grandmother's body was in a casket right there in front of us. Why were we all looking expectantly at this stupid purple curtain, when we were here for my grandmother?
I clued in on the purpose of the distractions when the bishop, or whatever his rank and serial number is, started reading stock phrases for the funeral ceremony. Don't worry, she's with Jesus. Don't worry, when we die there's this better place called heaven. Think about anything, anything at all, except the fact that she is dead. And if you can, think about God and Jesus, because if you do that, then not only will you be consoled, the need to stay consoled and not face the brutal reality that your loved one is gone might keep you needing Jesus.
I felt ripped off. I came there to grieve. I wanted the funeral I had assumed would happen, which was a social and communal opportunity to publicly share in my feelings of loss. My grandmother was a matriarch in my family, and a well respected member of the community. Her passing was a loss that I, and many others, wanted to express. I don't think I was the only one there who didn't want my grandmother's moment to be hijacked by some asshole named Jesus.
I walked away from that funeral wondering if I was afraid of death because the culture I grew up in was afraid of death, constantly looking for ways to say death is not that bad. While my parents aren't religious, there's no getting away from the obvious cultural influence that Christianity has on the society I grew up in.
I didn't grow up expecting to see any god after I died, but I did grow up with the haunting question of what would happen instead. If all religions have it wrong, then there is nothing, and that is even more scary than any hellfire imagined by men of faith.
It's so freaky because it is by definition outside of our ability to imagine. An afterlife, or reincarnation into another life, even if it is bad, is experienced, and we can evaluate it in terms of our ability to percieve it.
Without any faith in an afterlife, there is not only the cessation of experiences, but the cessation of the ability to experience. While alive, the mind can not stop thinking, nor place itself in a hypotehtical of what it would be to not think. It is the ultimate form of obliteration of the self, beyond what the self can know.
When my brain tries to wrap itself around the concept of complete lack of self, it can't help but to try and give it form. The very act of imagining is to give it a context and depiction, which can never actually represent the lack of context and anything to depict. So I end up thinking of death as being somehow an eternal blackness. Or worse, sometimes I get an image that resembles an eternity of being buried alive.
Which is why death scares me to... well, "... to death" is the standard phrase, isn't it? The measure by which all other fears are scored.
Right now it's not scaring me. I can spend all day talking or writing about death, the afterlife or lack of it, mortal dangers, the time I have left in this world, or whatever. It's all just words on a page or out of my mouth.
But to let you in on a little secret... every now and again, often when I have other stresses in my life, late at night when I'm falling asleep, I have terrors. The thought of dying fills me with a visceral dread that sometimes makes me suddenly yell in fright or jump out of bed.
It used to be pretty bad. A roommate I used to live with wore ear plugs because my near random and primal yells of fear would freak him out too. Not to mention irritate him by waking him up.
Somehow, as I fall asleep, the more higher order thoughts, the ones that are more connected with modern life and our complicated modes of cognition go to rest, and my more instinctual brain is left with only the most basic of concerns. At least, that's what I think happens, even though I have no idea of the actual neurological process involved.
All I know is that the fear is something that is always there, because it comes from a non rational, instinctual part of me that doesn't seem to care too much what kind of complicated rationales I concoct in my waking hours.
Maybe that doesn't need to be the case, though. Don't Christians and Bhuddists go to sleep as restful as can be, secure in the knowledge that there is more than just annihilation?
Maybe. And that kind of thinking made me doubt the point of having no religion in my life. Some argue that even if religion is ultimately a social construct created by man, it is still necessary because it stops us from falling into nihilistic depression. Not to mention maintain social order by offering punishment even to those that man's laws can't see or reach.
During the day, I reject that notion, because I feel that it's important to know the truth, not be consoled with comforting lies. Comforting lies are always ultimately made up by someone, even yourself, and are always at risk of being perverted to suit somebody's ambitions. Even your own.
At night, though, I couldn't help but be insecure that there is something lacking in a world view that makes me feel so fragile and terrified of oblivion.
I used to have them much worse. Once the terrors would start, they might not end on their own. In my twenties, when my tension level was aggravated by problems at school or work or in relationships, I would get my sense of dread at night and eventually have to get up and distract myself. Television was usually the way to go, as it engages your mind with the kind of vapid distractions designed to push out any serious thoughts about life.
I don't remember where I read it, but somewhere I came across advice that the way to cope with night terrors was not to fight it, but to simply acknowledge them. Remind yourself that they are an emotional, instinctual, irrational thought process, and that they do not represent you. Let them happen, and they will go away just as they came.
Which turned out to be at least partly helpful. After that, when I had a night terror, I told myself that I was just experiencing a fairly natural part of falling asleep, that as my rational thoughts gave way, I was just experiencing some feelings that are not part of my verbal mind.
That's the tricky part of the mind, that it is you, so whatever feelings you have, it's easy to think that they are honestly representative of you and who you are and what you are really about. But in some ways, it helps to see your mind as having parts, and as compelling as some thoughts are in terms of how real they feel, they may just be the result of neural activity that you are less consciously in control of.
I still got night terrors, but they were much reduced in frequency and duration. They became a mere occasional hiccup.
But the philosophical question remained. Had I found a band aid for a sore that was never going to heal because of my lack of religion?
I had an epiphany one time right in the middle of one of my night terrors. I realized that not only was it normal to have a primal response to the prospect of dying, but that the fear that prompts the primal response is critical to being alive.
The fear of death is what keeps animals moving. The fear of death is what makes you value life, and appreciate how much other people value it for themselves. Fear of dying is hard wired into the very core of your being.
Every single creature that lives, right down to the simplest forms, is built to fear death in every action. Well, of course the simpler the creature the term "fear" might be a bit overblown.
Anyway, we're pretty complacent now that we've dominated the planet. But every animal, fears death as a consequence of any missed opportunity. Even the predators that seem to deal out death also fear that they will die if they fail to catch their prey.
Think of what we lose when we stop fearing death.
We lose compassion. What does it matter if you kill other people? Let god sort 'em out. They aren't being denied anything, they are being passed on to another court of appeal.
We lose stewardship. What does it matter if the earth is dying, because it will all be swept away in an apocolypse that will make everything okay again anyway? Or it's all just a cycle that will happen again?
We lose motivation. I struggle daily to try and accomplish so many goals that I worry I won't finish before I die. If everything here is merely a test for the really desirable life afterwards, then one is reduced to simply following arbitrary rules in order to pass a grand entrance exam.
What about sacrifice? Sacrifice is easier when you think the act of dying for a good cause is the key to a better reality. It kills the very meaning of sacrifice if anything lost is replaced by a better alternative. A person who fears death and makes sacrifices really sacrifices, lending weight to the cause.
Sacrifice is a big topic, as I know the religious believe that without a judgment in an afterlife, there is justification for selfishness. It veers off topic, so I'll just leave it for now to say that sacrifice for a greater good is built into us just as much as fear of death is. Individual humans die in the wild, but groups live on to breed. Ensuring the survival of us sometimes means individuals take it for the team.
The point is, now not only do I accept my occasional primal fear of the prospect of dying, I accept dying itself. I value it, because it's what makes us actually human.
Denying death, pretending we are somehow immortal, that we'll be reborn or transported to another reality... that's the truly unnatural and dehumanizing approach.
We're supposed to be afraid of death. I've spent the better part of my life looking for a way to soothe a fear that has driven progress over billions of years all the way from tiny microbes all the way up to who I am now.
The night terrors come every now and again, though ironically less so now that I accept them that much more.
When they do happen, though, I take it a step further than merely accepting that they just happen and it's normal. I take it as an opportunity to ask myself if I am really living. Am I pursuing goals that matter, and becoming the person I hope to be?
Is the fear justified by the amount of value I put on what I lose when I die?
After all, death is nothing to be afraid of if you're not alive now. □
Comments
comment by Peter Zachos on Wednesday, February 3, 2010
All my condolences for your loss. And everything you're saying is pretty much spot on. The lengths which the average human will go to avoid the realities of death and the emotions it can conjur is sickening at best. I for one am empathetic that the ceremony which should have allowed you and everyone else to grieve was inundated with petty, dogmatic pandering.
comment by Sangomasmith on Wednesday, February 10, 2010
There is a way to experience death: just go under the knife. The gas or injection used to knock you out erases your memory of the event, leading to the moments before and after you go under happening to you in the same cognitive instant. The missed hours inbetween are the closest we can get to experience brain death: nothing, no sensation of time or memory or thought. Just nothing.
comment by Samson on Saturday, December 25, 2010
For give me for being petty, but this actually may be relevant to the central questions here. I couldn't help but add qualification to your characterization of Buddhists:
"Don't... Bhuddists go to sleep as restful as can be, secure in the knowledge that there is more than just annihilation?"
Your absolutely correct that most Buddhists around the world erroneously buy into the reincarnation thing to some degree and consequently may receive that primal comfort that is lacking in the post-modern scientific skeptics.
Moreover, most western non-Buddhists quite quickly think of reincarnation as being central to Buddhist dogma even though its not. Perhaps because karma and reincarnation actually quite a similar to the morality of the heaven/hell system from Christianity, people remember it easier.
But the real deal for Buddhists, that is the core teachings, teach meditation techniques by which one can experience enlightenment. Unfortunately due to vast and varied cultural and social aspects of the religion and its sects these teachings are often obscured. But the truth is that enlightenment is the complete dissolution of the self, and all experience. In other words, cessation of experience and the ability to experience, as you have defined your conception of death. Of course this is a momentary experience. Of course, the meditator having experience the death of the self then returns to ordinary reality, but as a completly changed, awakened person.
And so my point, via a very obnoxious and arcane analysis, is that core Buddhists who mediate deeply may actually be the only one who can penetrate the all the beliefs about death by actually experiencing death itself in this life. Knowing for oneself, undercuts all fear of the unknown!
comment by Dave (Autotelic) on Sunday, December 26, 2010
Samson, thank you for your clarification of Bhuddist doctrine as you see it.
To be honest, I don't think it is physiologically posssible for any human to meditate to a point that would actually simulate death. No matter what degree of controlled cessation of thought you achieved, the mere fact that it is a controlled cessation means it is not truly cessation of being.
In any case, though, if you are right that the meditative experience undercuts the fear of death, then I'd simply say that Bhuddists have nonetheless lost the purpose of living.
My contention is that fear of death is a pillar of what makes us human. Anything that salves the fear robs us of the meaning of life. Whether it's an afterlife or acceptance of no afterlife.
comment by Samson on Sunday, December 26, 2010
Dave, lay and monastic meditators around the world have been attaining cessation for the last 2500 years and probably much longer than that. The texts are chock full of stories about individuals actually doing it. I know of many people doing it today; and I've even met one and gotten the chance to ask him some probing questions.
Moreover, one of the most consistant descriptors of the expereince is that it is the only really contrived moment of their entire lives. Across the board, it's said to just happen. You cant make it happen almost by definition because what triggers the event is the very realization that there is no self.
But most importantly, I want to respond to your very beautiful "contention that fear of death is a pillar of what makes us human. Anything that salves the fear robs us of the meaning of life."
First, as you have said, part of what makes negative emotion worse is not accepting it. So I see you finding a construct to rationalize, normalize and accept your fear and thereby get some relief. Certainly, a lot healthier than the old church's solution, but it's different only a difference of degree, not kind. Both are salves, even though your brand is is probably bound to cause far fewer negative consequences as it is more benign, parsimonious, and reasonable than the whole mythology of the church.
Second, to say Buddhist have lost the purpose of living is just silly, given even the slightest familiarity with the religion. The whole point of all this - of getting of the fear of death by knowing death directly - is so we can get out of our own way and dedicate life to compassion and service of humanity, to the effort to reduce suffering and increase happiness for all being. For me, this is plenty of purpose in life.
Therefore, my argument is that any thing short of the experience of death is insufficient to really undercut the delusion. Only by realizing at the most fundamental level that there is no separate, permanent self that CAN die, are we able to understand what life and humanity are all about.
comment by Dave (Autotelic) on Monday, December 27, 2010
Samson, thank you for your continued interest in the topic.
First, I would like to point out that it does not matter how many stories are told of people attaining the experience of death through meditation. The number of people who tell of an experience over however many years does not make anything any more true. Put any one of your meditators in a brain scanner, and you will see brain activity. It is a qualified experience that you believe simulates death, but I don't think it does because I don't believe the self can be considered sufficiently annihilated to simulate death if enough of it remains to turn itself back on. Accepting that your meditation is close enough to actual death to create an experience of what it is to be dead is nothing more to me than a part of your religious narrative.
In order to convince me otherwise, it won't work to simply give me verbose descriptions of how deeply you believe your religion to be true, and lists of others who agree. I need something more concrete than that.
Your criticism that maybe all I have done is ironically attempt to salve my own fears by making a ouroborus of accepting death that death can not be accepted does have some weight, as I can see how my description could lend itself to that image.
However, what I would point out is that I am not trying to accept death or come to terms with it. What I am accepting is that is in my nature to fight death. Fight it hard. A futile fight, that I will ultimately lose. Nonetheless it is a continued fight that I sometimes feel viscerally.
But the fight itself is living, and that's what I have come to terms with.
Thus, I still maintain that Bhuddists, like any other religion, are walking down the wrong garden path by trying to find an acceptance of death. Once you accept death, you stop fighting for life.
Add a comment
Your name, or whatever you want to be called:
comment by Autotelic on Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Sangomasmith, I've been anaesthetized a couple times in my life. You're probably right that it's the closest to "experiencing" death, but by definition there is absolutely no memory of it. So there is nothing to compare, evaluate, or reflect on.
Besides, my point here is that there is no point in trying to experience it. At most, that might help you come to terms with it. And being at ease with death is a bad thing. Death is supposed to be feared. The only thing lost be losing a fear of death is the loss of the value of life.